Adult Porn News
Cyberspace (PRADULT) April 8, 2009 — In what I think will be a brilliant move from TeenRevenue, they have filed complaint for “unfair competition” and I don’t think the cash is without merit.
The crux of the case is: Say you own a Starbucks and Coffee Bean opens up right next to you, but Coffee Bean just gives away all their coffee foe free with the intent of shutting down Starbucks. Once Starbucks closes coffee beans starts charging for their coffee. It called unfair competition and California is very liberal with this. Now if you 30k prepay is now attached to a 50k lawsuit then of will make advertising with an illegal tube not even worth it, not to mention the hosting company now with a 50 page complaint now they must answer to. Tube profit margins are already very thin. Throw in a good legal fight and the whole cookie crumbles. Just my opinion.
The unfair completion isn’t my argument it is Teen Revenue’s. They are doing business in California, so they have to answer the case here. Another angle is they don’t have to keep 2257 records. We have the FBI at our office almost 2 years ago and we emerged squeaky clean. Why should have have to be on our P and Q’s and Redtube can just say “Fuck it”?
Lastly, I’ve have heard the whole “adupt like the music industry” argument before. The problem with porn is there is not really and concerts or t-shirts to sell. Nobody walks around wearing “Redtube” shirts or will ever see Redtube.com play live. Most people use porn 1 to X many times per day or week - wipe the sperm off the keyboard and go about their lives.
Porn is a closet case deal, even it’s #1 consumers will admit they do it publicly.
For the ongoing GFY Drama click here.
Technorati Tags: stubes porn, free tube, Porn2005 copyright PRadult.com. Disclaimer
PR adult news. A professional adult press release website. A place where journalists, webmasters, corporations and the adult industry can release their latest porn related news.
PR adult. Adult press release company
— PR Adult
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
34 queries. 0.750 seconds